The year 2025 marks the 45th anniversary of the enactment of the Foreign Investors Real Property Tax Act. It is a good time to revisit issues that are faced by nonresident investors considering an acquisition of real property in the U.S. For the private investor, many decision points must be addressed. Here are a few that come readily to mind: (1) Will the investment generate passive or active income? (2) Now and possibly in the future, will the investment be limited to one property or will there be multiple properties? (3) Is it better to own the property directly or through a holding company? (4) Should the holding company be formed in the U.S. or abroad there, or should there be holding companies in both places? (5) Should the holding company be tax-transparent or tax-opaque? (6) Will the structure prevent death duties from being imposed in the U.S.? (7) If the initial holding structure produces suboptimal results, can the structure be revised, and if so, at what cost? (8) Is it better to hold all U.S. properties through one U.S. holding company or is it better to hold each U.S. property through its own separate U.S. holding company? Stanley C. Ruchelman and Wooyoung Lee provide guidance to foreign investors and their home country advisers so that well-reasoned investment structures can be formulated at the front end that take into account U.S. tax rules, foreign tax rules, and preferences of the particular client.

INTRODUCTION

This is the final article in a three-part series that explains U.S. taxation under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“F.I.R.P.T.A.”). This article looks at certain planning options available to taxpayers and the tax consequences of each.

These planning structures aim to mitigate taxation by addressing several different taxable areas of the transaction. They work to avoid gift and estate taxes, and double taxation of cross-border events and corporate earnings, while simultaneously striving for preferential treatment (e.g., long-term capital gains treatment), as well as limiting over-withholding, contact with the U.S. tax system, and liability. Often, such structures are helpful in facilitating inter-family transfers and preserving the confidentiality of the persons involved.