HIDE

Other Publications

Insights

Publications

An American In London: Due Diligence Observations

An American In London: Due Diligence Observations

Performing due diligence on private companies for a potential merger or acquisition has been described as an exercise in educated guessing.  The quality of the target’s financial information, potential hidden liabilities, financing, and similar deficiencies may result in a valuation that is neither straightforward nor reliable.  When the target is abroad, the culture, language, and business norms may cause the educated guess to be more guess and less educated.  Knowing how to overcome this dilemma is a skill set that can be obtained only through experience.  Nick Magone, founder of Magone & Company, P.C., in Roseland, New Jersey, shares his experiences in performing due diligence on potential target companies in the U.K.  His advice?  Numbers are only the beginning.

Read More

I.R.S. Adds New Theory Why Merger Termination Fees are Capital Rather than Deductible Costs

I.R.S. Adds New Theory Why Merger Termination Fees are Capital Rather than Deductible Costs

The I.R.S. and taxpayers have long argued whether fees paid by one party to another in a failed merger are capital costs or deductible costs.  The consequences of capitalization may be severe, as sufficiently large capitalized costs may never be fully offset by future income.  Recently, the I.R.S. enunciated a new theory in support of its capitalization position.  Kenneth Lobo and Nina Krauthamer look at two recent internal memoranda indicating the I.R.S. will continue to characterize most merger termination costs as capital rather than deductible costs.

Read More

Corporate Matters: Is Your Deal Safe? How the F.C.P.A. Affects Mergers & Acquisitions

Read Publication

Foreign-based companies that do not do business in the United States might understandably ask how the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“F.C.P.A.”) can impact them. The answer is unexpectedly and profoundly – if the foreign company becomes an acquisition target of a U.S. company.

As 2015 begins, it is no longer news to anyone that a U.S. company doing business abroad must have a robust anti-corruption and anti-fraud compliance program. An effective compliance program can prevent F.C.P.A. problems from arising or, if such problems do arise, reduce a company’s penalties. It is equally important to remember that the F.C.P.A. can have as significant an impact on a company’s merger and acquisition transactions as it can on its everyday operations. For that reason, a foreign company looking to partner with, or be acquired by, a U.S.-based entity, must make sure that its conduct does not adversely affect or jeopardize such efforts. Recent developments in 2014, as well as past history, illustrate this point.

The F.C.P.A. plays a significant role in mergers and acquisitions. An acquiring company is expected to conduct due diligence to ascertain the acquired entity’s F.C.P.A. compliance. If in the course of that due diligence, the acquiring company uncovers violations by the entity to be acquired, it is expected to disclose them and remedy them. Otherwise, it risks F.C.P.A. liability of its own. In guidance issued in 2012, the D.O.J. warned:

[A] company that does not perform adequate FCPA due diligence prior to a merger or acquisition may face both legal and business risks. Perhaps most commonly, inadequate due diligence can allow a course of bribery to continue—with all the attendant harms to a business’s profitability and reputation, as well as potential civil and criminal liability.