HIDE

Other Publications

Insights

Publications

Tax Issues Faced by Foreign Persons Investing in Greek Commercial Real Estate

Tax Issues Faced by Foreign Persons Investing in Greek Commercial Real Estate

Greece’s diverse real estate market has become an increasingly attractive destination for foreign investment. The Mediterranean climate, rich cultural history, and growing economy make the country particularly appealing to investors looking for residential and commercial properties. Greece’s investment landscape is further enhanced by favorable tax incentives, such as the Non-Dom tax regime, the tax regime for pensioners, the tax regime for employees and freelancers, the family office regime, and the Golden Visa program. In their article, Natalia Skoulidou, a Partner of Iason Skouzos Tax Law, Athens, and Aikaterini D. Besini, a Senior Associate at Iason Skouzos Tax Law, Athens, provide a comprehensive overview of the tax landscape for foreign investors investing in Greek commercial real estate. Their article outlines the key tax considerations at each stage of the investment process to help investors navigate the complexities of Greece’s tax system in order to make well-informed strategic decisions. The outcome can be quite favorable to investors from abroad.

Read More

Strategic Considerations for International Investors in Dutch Real Estate

Strategic Considerations for International Investors in Dutch Real Estate

From an economic viewpoint, the Netherlands is a highly attractive destination for international real estate investors, thanks to its robust legal framework, transparent property market, and strategic location within Europe. From a tax policy viewpoint, however, the Dutch tax environment can be challenging, as it is subject to frequent legislative changes. Recent updates – including the partial discontinuation of the Dutch equivalent of a R.E.I.T., known as the F.B.I. regime, revised entity classification standards, and stricter interest deduction rules – have significantly impacted the landscape for cross-border investors. In his article, Anton Louwinger, a partner in CMS Netherlands, Amsterdam, explains the important issues at various points in the ownership period, including (1) R.E.T.T. or V.A.T. on purchases, (2) C.I.T. during ownership, (3) caps on deductions for interest expense and application of anti-abuse rules for payments to a foreign related party, (4) withholding tax on interest and dividend payments, (5) caps on the use of N.O.L.’s, and (6) taxation of capital gains upon sales.

Read More

A gRETT-able Situation: New Trends in German Real Estate Transfer Tax on Share Deals

A gRETT-able Situation: New Trends in German Real Estate Transfer Tax on Share Deals

For decades, the German Real Estate Transfer Tax Act ("gRETT Act") has imposed a transaction tax on the sale of real estate in Germany. In recent years, the tax has applied to the sale of shares that indirectly transfer real estate located in Germany. When initially enacted, a sale of all shares was taxable under the gRETT Act. In the year 2000, the triggering percentage was reduced to 95%. Last year, proposed legislation would have reduced the triggering percentage to 90%, but the draft bill was never enacted. In 2020, the triggering percentage may be reduced to as low as 75% or some other percentage whenever new legislation is adopted. Exactly what constitutes an indirect sale of German real estate is surprisingly broad, and unlike comparable taxes in other countries, the sales need not be related nor contemporaneous. In recent years, a populist clamor has arisen to broaden the scope of indirect transfers subject to the tax. Michael Schmidt of Schmidt Taxlaw, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, explains how and when the tax is imposed under current law and how it may be modified in the coming months.

Read More

New York State Says No to Annual Pied-A-Terre Tax, Yes to Increased Real Estate Transfer Taxes

New York State Says No to Annual Pied-A-Terre Tax, Yes to Increased Real Estate Transfer Taxes

As part of New York State’s annual budget process, law makers proposed an annual pied-à-terre tax on homes worth $5 million or more that do not serve as the buyer’s primary residence.  At the last minute, the tax was dropped and replaced by a 0.25 percentage point increase to the real estate transfer tax on sellers and a new graduated mansion tax, a special transfer tax imposed on purchasers.  Nina Krauthamer addresses the ins and outs of both taxes.

Read More

New Developments in the World of Reverse Like-Kind Exchanges

New Developments in the World of Reverse Like-Kind Exchanges

Tax planners to New York City real estate families understand that real estate should never be sold.  Rather, it should be exchanged in a tax-free, like-kind exchange.  The exchange can be bifurcated into two independent transactions – one a purchase and the other a sale – without affecting tax-free treatment, provided certain well identified rules are followed.  Moreover, the replacement can be acquired before the sale of an existing parcel is effected.  In a recent advisory opinion affecting property in New York State, the Department of Taxation and Finance issued a taxpayer-friendly advisory opinion involving real estate transfer tax exposure in a reverse like-kind exchange.  Rusudan Shervashidze and Nina Krauthamer explain the ruling. 

Read More

In the Matter of GKK 2 Herald LLC – Effects of the Step Transaction Doctrine

In the Matter of GKK 2 Herald LLC – Effects of the Step Transaction Doctrine

Clients that invest in U.S. real property have discovered that income tax planning for the structure is only once piece of the planning puzzle.  A second piece relates to the imposition of transfer taxes on the sale.  If the property is in New York City, planning must consider the real property transfer tax rules of both the city and New York State.  Both jurisdictions impose tax.  Rusudan Shervashidze looks at recent cases in the State of New York Division of Tax Appeals Tribunal and the New York City Appeals Tribunal involving the same plan, implemented by the same taxpayer, regarding the same parcel of real property.  For New York State purposes, the plan was successful.  However, for New York City purposes, the plan was overturned.  The statutes at the state and city level are almost identical.

Read More