Browse Articles:   By Category   /   By Author
HIDE

Other Publications

Insights

Publications

The Most Important 15 Questions to Ask About the Forfait in Switzerland

/
The Most Important 15 Questions to Ask About the Forfait in Switzerland

As one door closes for non-doms in the U.K., a tried and true door may open in Switzerland, in the form of a negotiated annual tax amount. For many decades, several cantons in Switzerland have adopted a special taxation regime known as the forfait. It allows foreign nationals relocating to the respective canton to pay tax based on worldwide living costs. Although the forfait regime was abolished in a number of cantons, a national vote was held in 2014 turning down a proposal calling for its elimination. In his article, Michael Fischer, the founding partner of Fischer Ramp Buchmann AG, Zürich, asks – and answers – questions about the most important elements to be considered when considering Switzerland as a new place of residence.

Read More

Swiss Lump Sum Tax Regime – Based on Annual Expenditures

/
Swiss Lump Sum Tax Regime – Based on Annual Expenditures

Switzerland can be an attractive country of residence for foreign nationals not pursuing an economic activity in Switzerland. Besides the ordinary income and wealth tax regime, Switzerland provides advantageous tax regimes for expatriates and for high-net-worth individuals. Lump sum tax regimes are based on rulings obtained from Cantonal tax authorities, and the tax base and tax rates vary among the Cantons. Aliasghar Kanani, a Partner of LE/AX Law Firm, Geneva, explains the rules that apply to income, wealth, and inheritance taxes and the advance planning that can prove helpful.

Read More

The Forfait Tax Regime in Switzerland – A Venerable Alternative

/

The Swiss forfait tax regime is discussed by Michael Fischer of Froriep in Zurich. The forfait is battle-tested and has beaten back a referendum in 2014 that would have repealed the benefit. Beware – the forfait is not available in all cantons and the minimum tax rate varies widely. In comparison to the U.K. and Ireland, remittances from abroad are not penalized with tax.

Read More

Foreign Correspondence: Notes from Abroad

/

Read Publication

HOLIDAY SHOPPING, CANADIAN RETAIL PRICES AND TRANSFER PRICING CONTROVERSY

By Michael Peggs

When people think of massive transfer pricing cases, the driver typically is the diversion of profits to a low-tax jurisdiction. But transfer pricing issues are now filtering down to the level of retail shoppers facing retail price disparity in adjacent jurisdictions. A typical case is the premium that Canadian purchasers generally pay over prices charged in the U.S. for comparable products.

Before the internet, it was customary for Canadians to receive flyers in the mail from U.S. grocery and department stores. The flyers offered bargains for the holidays. The internet now allows instant price comparisons and greater choice for Canadian consumers. Disregarding sub rosa impediments to competition that permeate many areas of the Canadian economy – think of cultural preferences – Canadians have complained loudly that retail prices are unfairly high when compared with exchange-adjusted U.S. prices. A typical example is print media where the premium for pricing the Canadian edition was not reduced over the period in which the Canadian dollar reached parity with its U.S. counterpart.

The Canadian government is now preparing to give the Competition Bureau new powers to persuade U.S. multinationals with Canadian retail operations to lower prices or to achieve retail price parity, as will be determined. One hopes that Industry Canada will intervene with the Canada Revenue Agency (“C.R.A.”) before drafting legislation, as an unintended consequence may be a new round of Canadian transfer pricing controversy.