Browse Articles:   By Category   /   By Author
HIDE

Other Publications

Insights

Publications

German Anti-Treaty Shopping Rule Infringes on E.U. Law

/
German Anti-Treaty Shopping Rule Infringes on E.U. Law

When do attacks on cross-border tax planning move from enough to too much? The European Court of Justice (“E.C.J.”) provided an answer in connection with German tax rules limiting access to the E.U. Parent Subsidiary Directive for dividends leaving Germany. For many years, German law provided an irrebuttable presumption of fraudulent or abusive tax planning when a multinational structure failed to meet a “one size fits all” set of factual parameters. The provision was struck down by the E.C.J. last year, modified slightly in response, and struck down again in July of this year. Pia Dorfmueller of P+P Pollath explains why the German tax law was found to violate European law – it provided a response that was not proportional to the alleged wrong-doing.

Read More

Joint Audits: A New Tool for Cross-Border Tax Evasion

/
Joint Audits: A New Tool for Cross-Border Tax Evasion

When a large corporate taxpayer receives an audit notification letter from the tax authority in its country of residence, the taxpayer typically knows what to expect: a lengthy process of documenting and defending its tax position. It also knows the process under domestic law for appealing adverse tax adjustments, and if cross-border issues are raised, it knows how to take advantage of Mutual Agreement Procedures between competent authorities under an income tax treaty. The full process can take years to resolve. Now, however, a pilot program between German and Italian tax authorities empowers a joint cross-border audit team to conduct a single joint audit of cross-border operations between the two countries. The joint audit is intended to be more effective for resolving issues of double taxation in cases involving complex facts related to (i) transfer pricing issues, (ii) residency or permanent establishment issues, and (iii) aggressive tax planning schemes. Marco Orlandi of Ludovici Piccone & Partners, Milan, examines the actual process followed in the pilot program and comments on whether the goals of the joint audit have been achieved.

Read More

Coming to the U.S. After Tax Reform

/
Coming to the U.S. After Tax Reform

Now, more than six months after enactment of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act, many tax advisers have achieved a level of comfort with the brave new world of Transition Tax, F.D.I.I., G.I.L.T.I., B.E.A.T., and incredibly low corporate tax rates. However, sleeper provisions in the new law can have drastic adverse tax consequences in the realm of cross-border transactions and investments: (i) the threshold for becoming a C.F.C. has been reduced significantly by several changes in U.S. tax law and (ii) the 10.5% tax rate for G.I.L.T.I. is limited to corporations so that individuals face ordinary income treatment for G.I.L.T.I. inclusions from foreign corporations that were not C.F.C’s. prior to the new law. Jeanne Goulet of Byrum River Consulting L.L.C., New York, addresses these problems and suggests several planning opportunities.

Read More

Israeli Court Case First to Interpret Ten-Year Exemption

/
Israeli Court Case First to Interpret Ten-Year Exemption

Effective in 2007, Israel’s New Immigrant Benefits rules are intended to promote immigration through the grant of substantial tax benefits: (i) a ten-year tax exemption for foreign-source income produced or accrued outside Israel or income stemming from assets located outside Israel and (ii) an exemption for all tax reporting requirements related to exempt income. Over the years, the Israeli tax authorities applied strict rules in determining (i) whether a specific item of income should be considered to be foreign source income and (ii) the portion that is properly treated as foreign in circumstances of mixed income – part foreign and part domestic. Now, eleven years after the New Immigrant Benefits rules became effective, the first case addressing these open questions has been decided, Talmi v. Kfar Saba Tax Assessor. Daniel Paserman and Inbar Barak-Bilu of Gorntizky & Co., Tel Aviv, report on the holding. In brief, the taxpayer won on principles but lost on the basis of his facts.

Read More

U.K. Requirement to Correct

/
U.K. Requirement to Correct

The “Requirement to Correct” (“R.T.C.”) rules for offshore tax affairs in the U.K. threaten steep penalties if noncompliant taxpayers at April 5, 2017, do not take action to correct the relevant noncompliance by September 30, 2018. In a detailed look at the R.T.C. rules, Gary Ashford of Harbottle & Lewis L.L.P., London, explains the ins and outs of the provisions, including (i) the definition of offshore noncompliance, (ii) covered taxes, (iii) penalties, (iv) the reasonable cause defense, (v) disqualified advice that cannot be reasonable cause, (v) the method that must be followed to implement a valid correction, (vi) the statute of limitations, and (vi) recent guidance from H.M.R.C. regarding last minute notifications by noncompliant taxpayers. The final date for completing a correction is December 29, 2018.

Read More

O.E.C.D. and European Commission Unveil Proposals on Taxation of the Digital Economy

/
O.E.C.D. and European Commission Unveil Proposals on Taxation of the Digital Economy

Following the release of the O.E.C.D.’s B.E.P.S. Action Plan and the E.U.’s approval of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Package, the taxation of the digital economy continues to be unfinished business in the international tax arena.   New O.E.C.D. and the European Commission documents mark a milestone, especially the latter, which include two different approaches.  They also highlight the difficulties in achieving a consensus, which seems desirable when implementing measures that increase the tax burden of digital activities.  José Luis Gaudier of Cuatrecasas, Barcelona, delves into the O.E.C.D. and the European Commission approaches to taxing the digital economy.

Read More

Do India’s Amalgamation Revisions Prevent Misuse of Accumulated Losses?

/
Do India’s Amalgamation Revisions Prevent Misuse of Accumulated Losses?

India’s recent Finance Act addressed a tax planning device intended to reduce or eliminate the imposition of the Dividend Distribution Tax ("D.D.T") that applies when a corporation exercises the right to distribute dividends to shareholders.   The statue targets plans involving an amalgamation between a profitable company and a loss company and prevents the reduction of earnings when the profitable company is the acquiring company.  Does this mean that earnings can be reduced when the loss company is the acquiring company?  Differing views have been expressed by Indian tax advisers.  CA Anjali Kukreja of R.N. Marwah & Co L.L.P., New Delhi, examines both views and explains why one view is technically preferable.

Read More

New Tax Treaty Between France and Luxembourg: French Tax Implications for Investors

/
New Tax Treaty Between France and Luxembourg: French Tax Implications for Investors

France and Luxembourg signed a new double tax treaty on income and capital in late March.  Ratification by the end of the year is anticipated.  The new treaty reflects the current post-B.E.P.S. environment.  Among other things, the residence definition is tightened, the test for the existence of a permanent establishment is loosened, real estate funds face higher withholding tax, a credit method is adopted to avoid double taxation.  Christophe Jolk, Attorney at Law, Paris, explains the implications for investors.

Read More

Failure to Prevent – The Future of Adviser Obligations

/
Failure to Prevent – The Future of Adviser Obligations

The concept of failure to prevent has grown from its roots in the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and is making inroads into the responsibilities of tax advisers.  The recent trend begs the question, do advisors have a duty to prevent the evasion or improper reduction of tax or to report the activity in advance?  A team of international advisors looks at the evolution of obligations: Peter Utterström of Peter Utterström Advokat AB, Stockholm, looks at the origin of the concept.  Gary Ashford of Harbottle & Lewis, London, looks at recently adopted legislation in the U.K. imposing strict liability on advisers to naughty clients.  Lawrence Feld, Attorney at Law, New York, looks at its presence in the U.S. Swiss Bank Program of the Justice Department.  Dick Barmentlo of Jaegers & Soons, Amsterdam, addresses a recent case in the Netherlands that imposes civil liability on a Netherlands trust company and its employees for lost taxes suffered by the Dutch tax administration.

Read More

India Budget 2018-19

/
India Budget 2018-19

The Indian government announced its plans for the 2018–2019 budget year.  It is the last full budget before the 2019 Parliamentary elections and the first budget following the implementation of the landmark national G.S.T. regime.  Tax is reduced to 25% for domestic companies generating income of approximately $40 million or less.  The definition of the term “business connection,” the equivalent of a P.E. under domestic law, is broadened to cover agents having and habitually concluding contracts and circumstances where a nonresident has a significant economic presence.  A 10% tax is imposed on certain stock market gains.  Incentives are given to international financial services companies in the form tax exemptions for certain gains.  These and other provisions are explored by Jairaj Purandare of JPM Advisors Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India.

Read More

A New Definition of Permanent Establishment in Italian Domestic Income Tax Law

/
A New Definition of Permanent Establishment in Italian Domestic Income Tax Law

Italian domestic tax law has adopted the permanent establishment (“P.E.”) concept when determining whether business profits of a nonresident are taxable in the absence of an applicable income tax treaty.  Earlier this year, changes to the definition of the term broadened the scope of activity constituting a P.E.  Effective January 1, 2018, (i) a digital P.E. is treated as a fixed place P.E., (ii) the scope of the specific activity exemption has been scaled back, (iii) an anti-fragmentation rule has been adopted applicable to groups of companies, and (iv) the scope of an agency P.E. has been broadened. Stefano Loconte and Linda Favi of Loconte & Partners, Milan, explain the new rules.

Read More

Doing Business Post-Brexit: What to Expect in the United Kingdom

/
Doing Business Post-Brexit: What to Expect in the United Kingdom

The U.K. is firmly on course to leave the E.U., with a target date of March 29, 2019.  After a difficult period of 18 months, agreements to address two important “divorce” issues – the exit payment and the status of Brits in the E.U. and Europeans in the U.K. on Brexit Day – have been reached, while a decision has been made to defer discussions regarding the border with Northern Ireland.  Graham Busch of Gerald Edelman, Chartered Accountants, London, addresses these and other settled issues as well as those for which a decision has been kicked down the road.

Read More

Circular Letter No. 25/E Clarifies Italy’s New Carried Interest Regime

/
Circular Letter No. 25/E Clarifies Italy’s New Carried Interest Regime

Early last year, the Italian government announced new rules regarding favorable taxation of carried interests.  Graduated tax rates and social charges would be replaced by a flat 26% tax on investment income.  Towards the end of the year, guidelines were published by the Italian tax authorities providing significant clarifications on the scope, requirements, and conditions under the new tax regime.  Andrea Tavecchio and Riccardo Barone of Tavecchio Caldara & Associati, Milan, examine how the new regime will work in practice.

Read More

Austrian Guidance on Taxation of Bitcoin and Other Cryptocurrencies

/
Austrian Guidance on Taxation of Bitcoin and Other Cryptocurrencies

While wild fluctuations in the value of Bitcoin are reported daily in global press and social media, the Austrian Ministry of Finance recently summarized its views on the tax consequences of investing in this relatively new asset class.  Niklas J.R.M. Schmidt and Eva Stadler of Wolf Theiss, Vienna, explain the real-life consequences of the transacting in virtual currencies.

Read More

The U.K. Trust Registration Service: Impact for Trustees

/
The U.K. Trust Registration Service: Impact for Trustees

The past few years have seen a steep increase in trust reporting obligations in the context of F.A.T.C.A. and the Common Reporting Standard.  Trustees must come to grips with a new set of record keeping and disclosure obligations introduced by the U.K. Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, which came into force from June 26, 2017.  Jennifer Smithson and Isobel Morton of Macfarlanes LLP, London, explain the wide-ranging effect of the regulations and the dividing line between non-U.K. trustees that fall inside the regime and those who are outside.

Read More

The New Transparency Register in Germany

/
The New Transparency Register in Germany

October 1, 2017, was the due date for entering information on Germany’s beneficial owner registry.  The register brings transparency to all sorts of entities, including private law foundations and trusts, as data will be open to public inspection from December 27, 2017.  Dr. Andreas Richter of P+P Pöllath + Partners, Berlin, sheds light on the registration requirements.

Read More

Brazil 2017: Tax Developments for Business Transactions

/
Brazil 2017: Tax Developments for Business Transactions

In Brazil, the year 2017 saw many important developments regarding cross-border and intrastate business transactions.  These developments focus on the implemention of various B.E.P.S. actions, the categorization of software transactions, and subjecting certain intrastate transactions to competing levels of state and municipal tax, all done the Brazilian way by emphasizing gross basis taxation on consumption payments.  Erika Tukiama, Rogério Gaspari Coelho, and Nathália Fraga of Machado Associados, São Paulo, provide guidance on these developments.

Read More

Swiss Federal Council Opens Consultation Process on Tax Proposal 17

/
Swiss Federal Council Opens Consultation Process on Tax Proposal 17

When Swiss voters rejected the Corporate Tax Reform Act III (“C.T.R. III”) in a referendum on February 12, 2017, Swiss tax reform was not derailed, only delayed.  Events that took place in September have moved the process forward. Existing cantonal tax privileges will be abolished, as agreed with the E.U., and replaced by mandatory introduction of a patent box regime in all cantons, voluntary introduction of additional deductions for research and development (“R&D”) expense, and a step-up in basis of hidden reserves created under the old tax regimes or before immigration to Switzerland.  Reto Heuberger, Stefan Oesterhelt, and Martin Schenk of Homburger AG, Zurich, explain the most important aspects of these and other aspects of T.P. 17.

Read More

Double Dutch: Dividend Tax Reform Extends Exemption, Yet Tackles Abuse

/
Double Dutch: Dividend Tax Reform Extends Exemption, Yet Tackles Abuse

This year’s budget in the Netherlands contains a legislative proposal that introduces a unilateral exemption applicable to corporate shareholders based in treaty countries, such as the U.S., subject to stringent anti-abuse rules.  In addition, it proposes to bring cooperatives used as holding vehicles within the scope of the dividend withholding tax rules.  Soon after the proposals were announced, a coalition government was formed and announced a complete elimination of dividend withholding tax.  Paul Kraan of Van Campen Liem in Amsterdam explains.

Read More

An American In London: Due Diligence Observations

/
An American In London: Due Diligence Observations

Performing due diligence on private companies for a potential merger or acquisition has been described as an exercise in educated guessing.  The quality of the target’s financial information, potential hidden liabilities, financing, and similar deficiencies may result in a valuation that is neither straightforward nor reliable.  When the target is abroad, the culture, language, and business norms may cause the educated guess to be more guess and less educated.  Knowing how to overcome this dilemma is a skill set that can be obtained only through experience.  Nick Magone, founder of Magone & Company, P.C., in Roseland, New Jersey, shares his experiences in performing due diligence on potential target companies in the U.K.  His advice?  Numbers are only the beginning.

Read More