Browse Articles:   By Category   /   By Author
HIDE

Other Publications

Insights

Publications

Too Bad To Be True – Code §§267A and 894(c) Signal the End for Cross Border Hybrids

/
Too Bad To Be True – Code §§267A and 894(c) Signal the End for Cross Border Hybrids

If you are a tax professional, you know your client is in a pickle if a provision under U.S. tax law disallows a deduction for the payor of an expense and another provision subjects the corresponding income of a foreign counterparty to U.S. tax, notwithstanding its residence in a treaty partner jurisdiction. That is the predicament that is faced when Code §§267A and 894(c) apply to outbound payments of deductible items to hybrid entities. In their article, Stanley C. Ruchelman and Neha Rastogi explain the death knell of what had been a common planning technique for U.S. tax advisers. They point out that, in certain circumstances involving payments to a reverse hybrid entity, relief might be provided by resort to competent authority proceedings.

Read More

Tax Issues for Remote Workers and Their Swiss Employers

/
Tax Issues for Remote Workers and Their Swiss Employers

While COVID-19 had a profound effect on remote working in various countries, Switzerland has long experience with one form of remoter worker – the daily commuter across national borders. Surrounded on three sides by Italy, France, and Germany, Switzerland has negotiated several tax agreements with its neighbors that split the income tax pie and address social security coverage. Some agreements have national coverage, while others have local coverage affecting only the cantons and municipalities that straddle a specific international frontier. The stakes are high for a Swiss employer as the income tax rates and the social security charges can vary dramatically based on which country is allocated the right to tax. Thierry Boitelle, the founder of Boitelle Tax Sàrl, Geneva, and Sarah Meriguet, a Senior Tax Attorney at Boitelle Tax Sàrl, Geneva, explain all.

Read More

Adventures in Cross-Border Tax Collection: Revenue Rule vs. Cum-Ex Litigation→

/

Published in Tax Notes Federal Volume 175, No. 3 & Tax Notes International Volume 106, No. 3: April 18, 2022. Copyright © 2022, Sunita Doobay and Stanley C. Ruchelman.

Read More

Off to New Shores: Tax Extern at Ruchelman P.L.L.C.

/
Off to New Shores: Tax Extern at Ruchelman P.L.L.C.

· Ruchelman P.L.L.C. actively participates in the extern arrangement for students in the LLM Program at New York Law School. We provide real life professional experience to the extern and the extern receives two credits towards his or her degree requirement. Our younger lawyers benefit by providing hands-on supervision of the extern, a needed step in professional development. Recently, we expanded our extern program to include European externs and trainee lawyers. Lioba Mueller spent two months with us as an extern, sponsored by the University of Bonn. She also qualified for a PROMOS scholarship, offered by the German Academic Exchange Service, under the German Ministry of Education and Research. In her article, Ms. Mueller tells of her experience in the U.S., both professionally with us and socially with others. Our experience with Ms. Mueller is that doing a good deed is, indeed, its own reward.

Read More

European Union’s New Reporting Obligations for Tax Intermediaries: Key Features of the Belgian Administrative Guidance – D.A.C.6

/
European Union’s New Reporting Obligations for Tax Intermediaries: Key Features of the Belgian Administrative Guidance – D.A.C.6

In their article entitled “European Union’s New Reporting Obligations for tax Intermediaries: Key Features of the Belgian Administrative Guidance – D.A.C.6,” Werner Heyvaert and Vicky Sheikh Mohammad of AKD Benelux Lawyers, Belgium, address key features of the Belgian administrative guidance and the list of Frequently Asked Questions recently published by the Belgian Revenue Service.

Read More

Implementation of the Mandatory Disclosure Directive in the Netherlands – D.A.C.6

/
Implementation of the Mandatory Disclosure Directive in the Netherlands – D.A.C.6

In his Article entitled “Implementation of the Mandatory Disclosure Directive in the Netherlands – D.A.C.6,” Paul Kraan of Van Campen Liem in Amsterdam, zooms in on a number of aspects and features of D.A.C.6 that are addressed in the Guideline, noting that there may be differences in interpretation between the various Member States with respect to the same provisions of the directive. Some are generic, others focus on specific Categories of Hallmarks such as B, C and E and the main benefit test. The article serves as a guide through a maze of troubling issues for which firm answers may not exist at this time.

Read More

The Implementation of the D.A.C.6 E.U. Directive in Germany

/
The Implementation of the D.A.C.6 E.U. Directive in Germany

Because German tax authorities have not yet published the final version of the administrative, commentary by German tax advisers have filled the gap pointing out open issues for which guidance should be provided. In their article for Insights entitled “The Implementation of the D.A.C.6 E.U. Directive in Germany,” Petra Eckl and Felix Schill of GSK Stockmann in Frankfurt, address the relevant issues, including covered taxes, tax arrangements, cross-border element, intermediary, hallmarks, main benefit test, and privilege.

Read More

D.A.C.6 Implementation in Luxembourg – Risk of Multiple Reporting Obligations

/
D.A.C.6 Implementation in Luxembourg – Risk of Multiple Reporting Obligations

In their article entitled “D.A.C.6 Implementation in Luxembourg – Risk of Multiple Reporting Obligations Exists,” Sonia Belkhiri and Jiar Al-Zawity of Wilson Associates, International Lawyers, Luxembourg, discuss official guidance to date and caution of the likelihood that exists for double counting reporting mechanisms. Their view is that the limited clarification within the commentaries to the draft law in Luxembourg and the State Council opinion have not been followed by the Luxembourg Government. Practical guidance from the Luxembourg tax authority has not been sufficient.

Read More

D.A.C.6 – The Italian Way

/
D.A.C.6 – The Italian Way

In their article entitled “D.A.C.6 – The Italian Way,” Fabio Chiarenza and @Carmen Adele Pisani of Gianni & Origoni, Rome, address the Italian rules implementing D.A.C.6. In comparison to advisers in other Member States who point out the areas in which guidance is sorely missed, the authors are able to take a deep dive into already issued Italian guidance, giving examples of how the guidance works in real life.

Read More

French Administrative Pronouncements on D.A.C.6

/
French Administrative Pronouncements on D.A.C.6

In their article entitled “French Administrative Pronouncements on D.A.C.6,” Mallory Labarriere and Anne-Lise Chagneau of Nexa Avocats, Paris, have prepared the ultimate guide to D.A.C.6 rules in France.

Read More

Update on Spanish Mandatory Disclosure Regime – D.A.C.6

/
Update on Spanish Mandatory Disclosure Regime – D.A.C.6

In their article entitled “Update on Spanish Mandatory Disclosure Regime – D.A.C.6,” José María Cusi, Juan Roda Moreno, and Cristina Rodríguez Lluch of CHR Legal, Barcelona, explain the problems encountered when Spanish law adopts D.A.C.6 terms that have no legal meaning in Spain, and do so without definition.

Read More

D.A.C.6 in Ireland – Key Features of the Administrative Guidance

/
D.A.C.6 in Ireland – Key Features of the Administrative Guidance

In his article entitled “D.A.C.6 in Ireland – Key Features of the Administrative Guidance,” Martin Phelan of Simmons & Simmons, Dublin, addresses the rules that apply to “cross-border arrangements” that will be reportable if one or more relevant “Hallmarks” are applicable. His F.A.Q.’s allow the reader to focus easily on the most important issues and answers.

Read More

D.A.C.6 Implementation in Cyprus

/
D.A.C.6 Implementation in Cyprus

In her article entitled “D.A.C.6 Implementation in Cyprus,” Nairy Merheje, of Der Arakelian-Merheje LLC in Nicosia, explains how Cyprus intends to overcome these challenges so that the Cyprus government can target and capture potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements resulting in tax base erosion of one or more E.U. Member States.

Read More